Non-Plagiarized Papers

Relying on the most credible sources and scrupulous research, we complete well-thought, plagiarism-free written papers of competitive quality.

Experienced Writers

Our cohesive group of well-trained, intelligent Master’s and PhD writers is familiar with all types of academic papers and can cope with them efficiently.

Timely Delivery

With respect to our clients, we strive to prepare every paper by the deadline and deliver it within the specified time.

Customer Support

Customer convenience and satisfaction are our major principles and we do our best for everyone to get prompt answers to their questions.

Advanced Pharmacology

Grading Guidelines

  • Each differential diagnosis there needs to be at least 2-3 that is supported by a rationale. A rationale may come from textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, assigned readings, or other scholarly sources. If sited from a book a page number must follow.
  • Treatment plans must be supported by at least one evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal article or clinical guideline. No intervention is self-evident. Provide an evidence-based rationale for each step of your plan. Note that websites like the Mayo Clinic and Harvard Men’s Health are not appropriate sites for rationalizing your care for a patient and would never stand up in a court of law. Points will be deducted for use of such websites. Grading Rubric from book here is the book we are reading….. Edmunds, M. W., & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.


Criteria A

Outstanding or highest level of performance


Total Points Possible= 135
  33 Points
Application of Course Knowledge



Post contributes unique perspectives or insights consistent with current standards of practice applicable to the results from the case study.
  33 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)


Initial discussion posts for parts 1, 2 and 3 are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided.


  33 Points


Post presents case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence; clearly relevant to topic.
  33 Points
Interactive Dialogue


Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer and respond to all faculty questions posted by Friday.

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

  3 points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to three errors.

Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday; First post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Friday; ; and part three by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.


customer service software